Military Panel says Climate Change Threatens environment

      Vanishing Earth's Global Environment News.                                 http://VanishingEarth.com

    Military Panel says Climate Change Threatens environment

       
    April 2007 -   Global climate change 
    presents a serious national security threat that could affect 
    Americans at home, impact U.S. military operations, and 
    heighten global tenvironment newsions, finds a study released today by a 
    blue-ribbon panel of 11 of the most senior retired U.S. 
    admirals and generals. 
    Climate change, national security and energy dependence are a 
    related set of global challenges that will add to tenvironment newsions 
    even in stable regions of the world, found the panel, known as 
    the Military Advisory Board. 
    Retired U.S. Marine Corps General Anthony Zinni is a former 
    Commander in Chief of U.S. Central Command. 
    "We will pay for this one way or another," said retired Marine 
    Corps General Anthony Zinni, former commander of U.S. forces 
    in the Middle East. "We will pay to reduce greenhouse gas 
    emissions today, and we'll have to take an economic hit of 
    some kind. Or, we will pay the price later in military terms. 
    And that will involve human lives. There will be a human 
    toll." 
    "The U.S. should commit to a stronger national and 
    international role to help stabilize climate changes at levels 
    that will avoid significant disruption to global security and 
    stability," the Military Advisory Board recommends. 
    The study, "National Security and the Threat of Climate 
    Change," explores ways in which climate change acts as a 
    "threat multiplier" in already fragile regions of the world, 
    creating the breeding grounds for extremism and terrorism. 
    The CNA Corporation, a nonprofit research and analysis 
    organization, brought together 11 retired four-star and 
    three-star admirals and generals as a Military Advisory Board 
    to provide advice, expertise and perspective on the impact of 
    climate change on national security. CNA writers and 
    researchers compiled the report under the board's direction 
    and review. 
    Members of the Military Advisory Board come from all branches 
    of the armed services. The board includes a former Army chief 
    of staff, commanders-in-chiefs of U.S. forces in global 
    regions, a former shuttle astronaut and NASA administrator, 
    and experts in planning, logistics, underwater operations and 
    oceanography. One member also served as U.S. ambassador to 
    China. 
    "We found that climate instability will lead to instability in 
    geopolitics and impact American military operations around the 
    world," said retired General Gordon Sullivan, chairman of the 
    Military Advisory Board and former Army chief of staff, in 
    releasing the report today at a Washington news conference. 
    Retired U.S. Army General Gordon Sullivan is a former Army 
    chief of staff. 
    "People are saying they want to be perfectly convinced about 
    climate science projections," General Sullivan said. "But 
    speaking as a soldier, we never have 100 percent certainty. If 
    you wait until you have 100 percent certainty, something bad 
    is going to happen on the battlefield." 
    Military Advisory Board members said they remain optimistic 
    that climate change challenges can be managed to reduce future 
    risks. 
    As part of its five specific recommendations for action, the 
    Board said "the path to mitigating the worst security 
    consequences of climate change involves reducing global 
    greenhouse gas emissions." 
    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency today released the 
    national greenhouse gas inventory, which finds that overall 
    emissions during 2005 increased by 0.8 percent from the 
    previous year. Overall emissions have grown by 16 percent from 
    1990 to 2005. 
    Retired Navy Vice Admiral Richard Truly, a shuttle astronaut 
    and former NASA administrator, said, "Unlike the challenges 
    that we are used to dealing with, these will come upon us 
    extremely slowly, but come they will, and they will be 
    grinding and inexorable." Retired Navy Vice Admiral Richard
     Truly was NASA administrator 
    from 1989 to 1992 and then served as director of the National 
    Renewable Energy Laboratory. 
    Truly also notes that "maybe more challenging is that climate 
    change will affect every nation, and all simultaneously. This 
    is why we need to study this issue now, so that we'll be 
    prepared and not overwhelmed by the required scope of our 
    response when the time comes." 
    The Military Advisory Board report recognizes that unabated 
    climate change could bring an increased frequency of extreme 
    storms, additional drought and flooding, rising sea levels, 
    melting glaciers and the rapid spread of life-threatening 
    disease. 
    These projected effects are usually viewed as environmental 
    challenges, but now the Military Advisory Board has looked at 
    them from the perspective of national security assessments. 
    They are serious risk factors for massive migrations, 
    increased border tenvironment newsions, greater demands for rescue and 
    evacuation efforts, and conflicts over essential resources, 
    including food and water, the board said, saying such 
    developments could lead to direct U.S. military involvement. 
    Retired Admiral Joseph Lopez is one of two flag officers in 
    the history of the U.S. Navy who have achieved four-star rank 
    after direct commission from enlisted service. 
    "Climate change can provide the conditions that will extend 
    the war on terror," said retired Admiral T. Joseph Lopez, 
    former commander-in-chief, U.S. Naval Forces Europe and of 
    Allied Forces, Southern Europe. 
    "Rising ocean water levels, droughts, violent weather, ruined 
    national economies-those are the kinds of stresses we'll see 
    more of under climate change," he said. 
    "In the long term, we want to address the underlying 
    conditions that terrorists seek to exploit," Admiral Lopez 
    said. "But climate change will prolong those conditions. It 
    makes them worse." 
    The report describes national security implications of climate 
    change in various regions of the world. 
    Europe: Tenvironment newsions may rise as immigration from Africa and the 
    Middle East- exacerbated by climate change-places additional 
    social and economic pressures on countries. Some of America's 
    strongest allies may be distracted as they struggle to protect 
    their own borders. Such an inward focus may make it more 
    difficult to build international coalitions, or engage in 
    exercises to environment newsure readiness. 
    "Europe will be focused on its own borders," retired Admiral 
    Donald L. Pilling, vice chief of naval operations, said in the 
    report. "There is potential for fracturing some very strong 
    alliances based on migrations and the lack of control over 
    borders." 
    Africa: The report focuses on the ways in which climate change 
    can contribute to shortages of food, drinking water and 
    farmland, adding strain in a region that is already the source 
    of 30 percent of the world's refugees. It states: "Such 
    changes will add significantly to existing tenvironment newsions and can 
    facilitate weakened governance, economic collapses, massive 
    human migrations, and potential conflicts." 
    "We ought to care about Africa because we're a good country," 
    retired Air Force General Charles "Chuck" Wald said in the 
    report. As deputy commander of the United States European 
    Command, he was also responsible for U.S. forces in Africa. 
    Retired Air Force General Charles "Chuck" Wald is a command 
    pilot with more than 430 combat hours over Vietnam, Cambodia, 
    Laos, Iraq and Bosnia. 
    "We have a humanitarian character; it's one of our great 
    strengths, and we shouldn't deny it. Some may be tempted to 
    avert their eyes, but I would hope we instead see the very 
    real human suffering taking place there. We should be moved by 
    it, challenged by it." 
    "Even in the context of security discussions, I think these 
    reasons matter, because part of our security depends on 
    remaining true to our values," General Wald said. 
    "We import more oil from Africa than the Middle East - 
    probably a shock to a lot of people - and that share will 
    grow... we'll be drawn into the politics of Africa, to a much 
    greater extent," he said. 
    Middle East: Noting this is the region of the world in which 
    the U.S. is most engaged militarily, the report states that 
    "water resources are a critical issue... and will become even 
    more critical... Competition for increasingly scarce resources 
    may exacerbate the level of conflict." 
    "The existing situation [in the Middle East] makes this place 
    more susceptible to problems," said General Zinni, the former 
    CENTCOM commander. "Even small changes may have a greater 
    impact here than they may have elsewhere. You already have 
    great tenvironment newsion over water. These are cultures often built 
    around a single source of water. 
    "It's not hard to make the connection between climate change 
    and instability, or climate change and terrorism," General 
    Zinni said. 
    Latin America: The report states, "Rising sea levels will 
    threaten all coastal nations. Caribbean nations are especially 
    vulnerable in this regard, with the combination of rising sea 
    levels and increased hurricane activity potentially 
    devastating to some island nations... and a likely increase in 
    immigration from neighbor states." In addition the report 
    finds that "[l]oss of glaciers will strain water supply in 
    several areas, particularly Peru and Venezuela." 
    Asia: The report finds that many factors may affect the 
    continent. Potential sea level rise would have a severe impact 
    with almost 40 percent of Asia's population of nearly 4 
    billion living within forty-five miles of coastlines. In 
    addition, the reduced availability of farmland and drinking 
    water and the increased spread of infectious disease would 
    destabilize the region. 
    One Military Advisory Board member, retired Navy Admiral 
    Joseph Prueher, views Asia from two perspectives, having been 
    commander of all U.S. forces in the Pacific and later U.S. 
    ambassador to China. He suggested, as the full report does, 
    that the U.S. should work with key international partners, 
    including China, one of the leading emitters of atmospheric 
    carbon. 
    Retired Navy Admiral Joseph Prueher was U.S. ambassador to 
    China from November 1999 to May 2001. 
    "On the issue of carbon emissions, it doesn't help us to solve 
    our problem if China doesn't solve theirs. And that means we 
    need to engage with them on many fronts," Admiral Prueher said 
    in the report. "Not talking to the Chinese is not an option." 
    The Military Advisory Board found that climate change impacts 
    may affect U.S. military bases, requiring the Pentagon to 
    prepare differently for future national security scenarios. 
    Rising sea levels could threaten coastal bases at home and 
    abroad, and increasing storm activity could deter the 
    military's ability to perform routine maintenance or carry out 
    regular exercises. 
    Changing ocean salinity could require changes in sonar and 
    submarine systems. 
    Drought conditions could require new logistical plans and 
    equipment for moving water to U.S. troops in war zones. 
    The need for new kinds of humanitarian operations could 
    necessitate new training to address these different missions. 
    Climate change may have differing impacts on the four branches 
    of the armed services. The former head of the U.S. Army 
    Materiel Command, retired General Paul Kern, said changes may 
    make it more difficult for the Army to handle basic supplies. 
    "Military planning should view climate change as a threat to 
    the balance of energy access, water supplies, and a healthy 
    environment, and it should require a response," General Kern 
    said in the report. "Responding after the fact with troops - 
    after a crisis occurs - is one kind of response. Working to 
    delay these changes - to accommodate a balance among these 
    staples - is, of course, another way." 
    General Wald raised additional concerns. "Will the Air Force 
    be expected to move larger quantities of supplies, including 
    fuel, food or drinking water? Will they be expected to move 
    larger numbers of people, perhaps in evacuations? Will we have 
    the right kind of equipment, personnel and training to handle 
    new missions, without diminishing our conventional military 
    capacity? That's barely a start, but it gives you a sense of 
    the scale of potential change." 
    The report notes that changes in the salinity of oceans, if 
    glaciers melt and water temperatures change, could affect 
    submarine equipment such as sonar. There may also be a greater 
    need for civilian evacuations. Marines and Special Operations 
    forces are trained and equipped now primarily for small to 
    medium sized rescue operations. 
    Admiral Pilling said that if climate change increases the 
    frequency or intenvironment newsity of hurricanes, there could be a 
    destabilizing effect on the Navy, especially in the 
    Southeastern United States. 
    The report cites the Arctic as a region of particular concern 
    for military planners. "If the warming we've seen in the high 
    Arctic continues, then there is a possibility of a new sea 
    route, a Northwest Passage if you will," retired Vice Admiral 
    Paul G. Gaffney II, former chief of naval research and the 
    former president of National Defense, said about 
    the study. 
    Retired Vice Admiral Paul G. Gaffney II now is the president 
    of Monmouth University in New Jersey. 
    "Will we be ready for both that opportunity and a new sea lane 
    to defend? Will we have the right kinds of ships? Will we be 
    ready for the acoustic surveillance challenges in a changed 
    environment? Will it inspire a mission that requires greater 
    air support from the Navy or the Air Force? What kinds of new 
    basing arrangements will be necessary? These are questions 
    security planners should be contemplating," said Admiral 
    Gaffney. 
    The Military Advisory Board chose not to engage in debate over 
    climate science but did note that current levels of 
    atmospheric carbon are already at historically high levels and 
    are increasing. 
    "This rise presents the prospect of significant climate 
    change," the board said in its letter transmitting the report 
    to the American public. "And while uncertainty exists and 
    debate continues regarding the science and future extent of 
    projected climate changes, the trends are clear. The nature 
    and pace of climate changes being observed today and the 
    consequences projected by the consenvironment newsus scientific opinion are 
    grave and pose equally grave implications for our national 
    security." 
    The Military Advisory Board called on the Defense Department 
    to find ways to limit the extent of climate change, in part by 
    controlling its own greenhouse gas emissions and fuel use 
    while simultaneously increasing combat capabilities for 
    American forces worldwide. 
    "Our national security is inextricably linked to our country's 
    energy security," said retired Navy Admiral Frank "Skip" 
    Bowman, who was director of the Naval Nuclear Propulsion 
    program. 
    "The military should be interested in fuel economy on the 
    battlefield," retired Lieutenant General Lawrence P. Farrell 
    Jr., who was deputy Air Force chief of staff for plans and 
    programs, said in the report. "It's a readiness issue. If you 
    can move your men and materiel more quickly, if you have less 
    tonnage but the same level of protection and firepower, you're 
    more efficient on the battlefield. That's a life and death 
    issue." 
    The Military Advisory Board recommends:
      The national security consequences of climate change should 
      be fully integrated into national security and national 
      defense strategies.   The U.S. should commit
     to a stronger national and 
      international role to help stabilize climate changes at 
      levels that will avoid significant disruption to global 
      security and stability.   The U.S. should commit to global
     partnerships that help less 
      developed nations build the capacity and resiliency to 
      better manage climate impacts.   The Department of 
    Defenvse should enhance its operational 
      capability by accelerating the adoption of improved business 
      processes and innovative technologies that result in 
      improved U.S. combat power through energy efficiency.
       DoD should conduct an assessment of the impact on U.S. 
      military installations worldwide of rising sea levels, 
      extreme weather events, and other possible climate change 
      impacts over the next 30 to 40 years. 
        The full report, "National Security and the Threat of 
        Climate Change," is available at: 
        http://SecurityAndClimate.cna.org. 
    







Environment News Home

Vanishing Earth Environmental News Home


Active © 2009; VanishingEarth.com
Designed & Powered by WorldsLargestNetwork.com