Transgenic Corn Damaging Stream Ecosystems

Transgenic Corn Damaging Stream Ecosystems



October 2007

 A widely planted variety of 
genetically engineered corn has the potential to harm aquatic ecosystems, 
finds a new study by an Indiana University professor of environmental 
science and his colleagues. 
Pollen and other plant parts containing toxins from genetically engineered 
Bt corn are washing into streams near cornfields and harming a type of fly 
that is eaten by fish and amphibians, the study demonstrates. 
Bt corn is engineered to include a gene from the micro-organism Bacillus 
thuringiensis, Bt, which produces a toxin that protects the crop from 
pests, especially the European corn borer. 
The research team led by Todd Royer, an assistant professor in the Indiana 
University School of Public and Environmental Affairs, found that 
consumption of Bt corn pollen, leaves and cobs increased mortality and 
reduced growth in caddisflies, aquatic insects related to the pests 
targeted by the toxin in Bt corn. 
"Caddisflies," Royer said, "are a food resource for higher organisms like 
fish and amphibians. And, if our goal is to have healthy, functioning 
ecosystems, we need to protect all the parts." 
Caddisfly larvae are an important part of stream ecosystems, where they 
help control algae populations and provide food for fish and other 
creatures.  In healthy streams, caddisflies are very common and their 
cases are found by the hundreds under rocks and logs.

Bt corn was licensed for use in 1996 and quickly gained popularity. By 
2006, around 35 percent of corn acreage planted in the United States was 
genetically modified, the study says, citing U.S. Department of 
Agriculture data. 
Before licensing Bt corn, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 
conducted trials to test its impact on water biota. But it used Daphnia, a 
crustacean often used for toxicity tests, and not insects that are more 
closely related to the target pests, Royer said. 
"Every new technology comes with some benefits and some risks," he said. 
"I think probably the risks associated with widespread planting of Bt corn 
were not fully assessed." 
If there are unintended consequences of planting genetically engineered 
crops, Royer says farmers should not be held responsible. In a competitive 
agricultural economy, producers have to use the best technologies they can 
get, he said. 
Funded by the National Science Foundation, the study is published this 
week by the journal "Proceedings of the National Academies of Science, 
PNAS." 
There was a public outcry over the use of Bt corn in 1999, when a report 
indicated it might harm monarch butterflies. But studies coordinated by 
the federal Agricultural Research Service and published in PNAS concluded 
Bt corn was not a significant threat to monarchs. 
Around that time, Royer said, he and his colleagues wondered whether the 
toxin from Bt corn was getting into streams near cornfields, and, if so, 
whether it could have an harmful impact on aquatic insects. 
Their research, conducted in 2005 and 2006 in an intensely farmed region 
of northern Indiana, measured inputs of Bt corn pollen, leaves and cobs in 
12 headwater streams, using litter traps to collect the materials. They 
also found corn pollen in the guts of caddisflies, showing they were 
feeding on corn pollen. 
In laboratory trials, the researchers found caddisflies that were fed 
leaves from Bt corn had growth rates that were less than half those of 
caddisflies fed non-Bt corn litter. They also found that a different type 
of caddisfly had significantly increased mortality rates when exposed to 
Bt corn pollen at concentrations between two and three times the maximum 
found in the test sites. 
Royer said there was considerable variation in the amount of corn pollen 
and byproducts found at study locations and there is geographical 
variation. Farmers in Iowa and Illinois, for instance, are planting more 
Bt corn than those in Indiana. The level of Bt corn pollen associated with 
increased mortality in caddisflies, he said, "could potentially represent 
conditions in streams of the western Corn Belt." 
There are four bands of Bt corn seed available commercially - YieldGard 
from Northrup King (Novartis); YieldGard2 from Monsanto; YieldGard 
Rootworm from Monsanto; and Herculex from Pioneer DowAgra-Sciences. 
Other crops such as potatoes and cotton also make use of Bt technology. By 
1999, 29 million acres of Bt corn, potato and cotton were grown globally. 
When proponents of Bt technology list the benefits, they often say the Bt 
proteins in the crops will not kill beneficial insects. Royer and his team 
showed that claim is not accurate in the case of caddisflies. 
Other principal investigators for the study, titled "Toxins in transgenic 
crop byproducts may affect headwater stream ecosystems," were Emma 
Rosi-Marshall of Loyola University Chicago, Jennifer Tank of the 
University of Notre Dame, and Matt Whiles of Southern Illinois University. 

---